AeroHance - GetPodded

GasPods - Save Fuel - Save Money - Save Time - Save The World

GasPods improve the aerodynamic efficiency of vehicles to reduce fuel consumption, which saves money and, for every gallon of gas saved, 19.4 lbs of CO2 are prevented from entering the atmosphere, and approximately 97 gallons of water are left unpolluted.

GasPods are easy to install on any vehicle. Magnetic models can be as easily removed.

Field testers' results exceed the 5% savings predicted by computational aerodynamic performance tests.

Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis

Simulated Wind Tunnel Testing

Computational aerodynamic performance modeling analysis (simulated wind tunnel testing) conducted by the world's largest independent Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) focused provider of engineering simulation software, support and services, concluded that a kit of 10 GasPods placed along the rear roof of a vehicle traveling 35 and 65 mph expanded, organized, and enhanced the airflow to result in a reduction of the vehicle's drag coefficient by around five percent (5%).

GasPods

Adding GasPods along the rear side of the vehicle further reduced its drag coefficient by an additional 1.6%, to increase the aerodynamic efficiency of the vehicles tested by 6.7%.

GasPods

This translates into an improvement in fuel consumption for the test vehicle of just under 1.3 mpg, or an extra 18 miles for its 14.5 gallon tank.

Based on the foregoing, you can multiply 1.25 by the number of gallons your gas tank holds to calculate how many extra miles per tank you can expect to drive before next filling up.


Methodology

Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is an analysis tool to predict physical fluid flow and heat transfer using computational methods, and was chosen as the preferred method for second stage of product viabiliity verification. A CFD provider with 30 years of experience working with 3000 different companies, from 30 offices around the globe, and spending over $165 million on their software and services were retained to conduct the study.

The objective of the project was to investigate the effect of GasPods installed on a car for aerodynamic performance in terms of drag reduction.

A 3D CAD geometry of a production personal vehicle (VW Golf IV two door) was selected and purchased.

Four CFD models were created using STAR-CCM+.These models represent a baseline geometry of the vehicle and three geometries with GasPods installed.

The computational models were generated based on standard mesh settings for external aerodynamic analyses with appropriate refinement particular to this model.

The drag coefficient predicted from the baseline model was compared against the published data for the vehicle, and found to be within an acceptable range for control. Analyses were performed for the vehicle speed of 35 and 65 miles/hour for the baseline (without GasPods), and with GasPods installed in 3 different configurations.

Wind Tunnel


Exterior Boundary Conditions


Fluid Properties at Inlet


Analysis Setup


Run Statistics - First Test Series


Run Statistics - 2nd Test Series


Summary and Conclusion

CFD results show that installing GasPods on the rear roof of the car reduces the drag coefficient by about 0.0186, which is equivalent to 5.24 % reduction in drag. CFD results from installing GasPods on the rear part of the car, namely c-pillar and the rear roof reduces the drag coefficient by about 0.024, which is equivalent to 6.76% reduction in drag.

It is well known in the literature that the strength of a pair of longitudinal trailing vortices formed on the side edges of the slanted rear of a car are directly associated with its base pressure. The high negative base pressure induced by the strong longitudinal vortices result in high drag. Reduction in the strength of the longitudinal vortices weakens the downwash between them, which results in increase in base pressure.

Presence of GasPods in the growing boundary layer decelerates the downstream flow, which results in a pressure rise inside of the shear layer. This pressure rise propagates through the shear layer into the base region of the vehicle. Presence of GasPods on the roof causes increase in base pressure of the vehicle in the wake region, which results in reduction in drag.

Drag and Drag Coefficient

A drag force is a component of the resultant force on an object that is parallel to the freestream.

A drag force on a vehicle consists of two contributions: pressure (or form) drag and skin friction drag.

Pressure drag is the stream-wise component of the pressure force integrated over the entire vehicle while skin friction drag is the stream-wise component of the shear force (friction between the air and vehicle surface) over the vehicle.

Aerodynamic performance of various vehicles is often described by a drag coefficient which is independent of the vehicle speed and shape (area). The drag coefficient of a vehicle remains close to constant over the range of typical highway speeds (45 to more than 100 mph).

A drag coefficient is defined by the following formulae:

drag coefficient, formula for drag coefficient

Since a drag coefficient remains relatively constant in a typical range of operations, a drag force varies with density (altitude), frontal area of the vehicle, and vehicle speed. For a certain vehicle model at a certain altitude, a drag varies only with vehicle speed as shown below:


This analysis demonstrates that change in the flow field, especially pressure in the vicinity of the shear layer that lies between the free stream and the re-circulation region can decrease drag on the vehicle.

Although Gas Pods increase the profile drag, overall reduction in drag by modifying flow structures in the wake layer turns out to be greater than the addition of the profile drag.

Appendix

Frontal area is the projected area of the vehicle onto the plane normal to the flow direction.

Pressure coefficient is another non-dimensional variable used to represent pressure (force per unit area).

The following values were used to convert dimensional variables such as drag, pressure, and shear stress to corresponding non-dimensional variables while reference values are arbitrary.

Help us to gather more data. Join our GasPod Test Team Today!

Initial Field Studies validate the computational results with participants realizing fuel savings of between 2% and 19%.

Variation is due to differences in the aerodynamic characteristics of the vehicles driven. Also, racks that run across the roof, perpendicular to the direction of travel, interfere with the streamwise flow of the air, and appear to limit the benefit of GasPods placed along the rear roof line.

Better results are achieved by long distance commuters and road trippers who are driving primarily at highway speeds than are realized by those who drive primarily at low speeds, with constant accleration and slowing down, such as occurs with those who are primarily city drivers.


We are particularly excited about the mileage logs provided by Test Team Member GP, Beacon, New York. He documented 5.92% fuel savings over 4,796 miles of mixed city and highway driving his 2012 Volkswagen Golf TDI (diesel), offering real world driving verification of the link between the reduction in the drag coeffecient shown by computational studies and fuel savings. The computational studies were performed using a VW Golf car body, which we chose because it is among the world's most popular vehicles, with nearly 30 million made, and the fuel efficiency rating for the "TDI" is high. This raises the fuel savings realized by adding GasPods in line with contemporary standards.

fuel mileage, mileage logs, mileage records, gaspods on VW golf tdi

His comment: "I was skeptical at first when my boss, after hearing that I bought a fuel efficient car, sent me a link to the GasPods.com site and stated that maybe I could save even more fuel. I sort of laughed it off but then when I started reading about it and researched turbulators in general I decided to give them a try. I have to admit I was impressed. After purchasing my car I was attempting to break the 50-MPG average consumption threshold for the full tank and I was coming up shy. You can imagine how ecstatic I was when I easily broke that threshold after mounting the GasPods. The important point here is that I was already trying to get the best fuel economy I could before I even heard of GasPods, then after ordering a set and mounting them to my car I actually experienced further improvement. So to me this validates 100% that GasPods made the difference and not modified driving habits."


2008 ford fusion, mileage enhancement, gaspod placement

Test Team Member JJ, Chandler, Arizona logged best results, fuel savings of 11.2% over original baseline (without GasPods) when staggering their placement across the rear trunkline. He logged nearly to 25,000 miles of drivng with GasPods with 6 different placement configurations. He is conducting a new baseline, without GasPods, as this is posting to validate these most recent high results



ecomodifications to honda civic si, aerodynamic accessories for honda, fuel savings, honda, civic si

Test Team Member HR, Santa Barbara, California, drives primarily in the city, and in Santa Barbara the pace is s..l..o..w... He nonetheless realized a 3.06% savings, or about 9 extra miles per tank of gas, logged over 3,938 miles of drivng. He's taking a road trip next month and will get back to us with mileage, since he did do some highway driving during the baseline, but very little during the with GasPod term of the test.


ecomodifications to honda accord, ecomod, fuel savings, honda, accord

Test Team Member FM, Oxford, Georgia, had already instituted a series of fuel savings efforts, which increased the mileage of his 1991 Honda Accord from an average 26.3 mpg, to 33.9 mpg. Even with this already strong - 28.9% - savings baseline, FM was able to achieve an additional mile per gallon, realizing a 35.1 mpg gallon average logged over 3,373 miles of driving.


gas prices, gaspods on subaru forester, gaspods on SUV

Test Team Member SM, Branford, Conneticut logged 2,111 miles without GasPods on his 2011 Subaru Forester. He then logged 2,579 miles with GasPods placed across the rear roof line.

During the test period, gas prices increased by 30 cents per gallon! With GasPods on his Subaru, SM saved 30 cents for every 2 days of driving, 45.42 fewer lbs of CO2 were released into the atmosphere, and 227 gallons of water were saved from pollution due to the refinery process.


keeping ahead of inflation, gaspods on vw, gaspods on vanagon

Test Team Member HR, Felton, California is keeping ahead of gas price inflation with a kit of 9 GasPods on his 1986 Volkswagen Wesphalia Vanagon. During the time that he logged his baseline mileage the average price he paid for gas was $4.05 per gallon. During the time that he logged his mileage with GasPods along the rear roof line of his Vanagon, the average price he paid for gas was $4.30 per gallon. Traveling an extra mile per gallon, the 5% savings realized, kept the price he paid per mile at an average 23 cents, both before and after. His mileage logs show an average savings of 25 cents per gallon of gas.


<>

Test Team Member AH, Long Beach, California logged 4,438 miles of driving, without GasPods, to establish a baseline average of 32.8 miles per gallon. She then drove 7,165 miles with GasPods installed within the rear roof line of her 2009 Toyota Yaris, and logged an average 36.7 miles per gallon.

Her comment, "I noticed the savings right away. I was able to drive longer between fill ups." Her mileage logs show this to be the case. They also show that during the term of testing, her carbon footprint was reduced by 448 lbs., and over an acre foot of water was saved from consumption in oil and gas production.


gaspods, save fuel on road trip, road trip, driving to alaska

Test Team Member ES, Santa Barbara, California saved $25.18 on a road trip to Alaska by adding GasPods to the Toyota Highlander he was driving. He logged a baseline mileage, without GasPods, of 21.45 miles per gallon on the first leg of the road trip from Alaska to Santa Barbara. For the return trip, he added a set of GasPods placed just below the rear roof rack. His average gas mileage increased to 22.18, a 3.42% savings.


Test Team Member KC, Manassas, Virginia, logged 2,562 miles baseline (without GasPods on her car) between June 6 and July 13, 2012. Between August 18 and September 4, 2012, She logged 2,230 miles with GasPods placed on her 1998 Ford Taurus. Her mileage increased by 24.4 miles per tank of gas, representing a 4.26% savings, or $2.55 per tank of fuel. Based upon her driving averages, a kit of GasPods will pay for themselves with savings in less than 3 months.


Test Team Member SB, Portsmouth, New Hampshire, logged 2,124 miles baseline (without GasPods on his car) between June 21 and July 23, 2012. He then logged 2,619 miles with GasPods placed on his 2006 Ford Escape Hybrid SUV, as pictured. His mileage increase was 9 miles per tank of gas, or 1.88%.

He is going to continue logging with GasPods placed a few inches further back, in line with the slope of roof ridges, and an extra set of GasPods before his front window. We look forward to receiving his results.